+15: Second Comma in A 2 S 1 C 5 of The Constitution 2

Again, better focus supported my original inclination and showed a strong argument for the second comma being not just correct to be there but also not needed. First, for the argument that the part "at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution" could be understood to also apply on the "natural born Citizen" one could ask why then the first comma was used? This counter argument will be strengthened by seeing the importance of the purpose the second comma could be serving. The second comma supports that the description" at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution" applies to being a Citizen and not to "United States". Without this comma it could be argued that it is always permitted for person who is not a "natural born Citizen" to become the President of the country if he is from one of the States that formed the "United States" during the Adoption of the Constitution.    

+14: Second Comma in A 2 S 1 C 5 of The Constitution

The second comma in Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution ("No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to...") seems to really stands against my inclination that the effect of all commas and capitalization should be counted in and not ignored.

+13

My top personal priority is an enormous thinking task (the task of trying to recover from and reverse being erased from existence from the start). All the applicable resources for that task (time and my own mind) are usable now. 

+12

At least partly, the purpose of the preceding post is to remove any unease or discomfort because of the thought that I could be in an unease or discomfort or that I am losing the passing time. For that purpose it was intended for a different blog in order to be as much as possible closer to expressing my condition and beyond mere taking of responsibility for my position toward a situation connected to things mentioned here.      

+11

Are we really in a new year? Last year ran out like a weekend. Any other person with the free time of the unemployed and still his problem is the lack of time?   

+10

One may have a tendency to fill the gaps and complete perceived things to a familiar form and that is also applicable to behaviour. The like of this guy may benefit from that inclination unless there is conscious effort to counter it. I have not seen somebody supposedly trying this hard to correct something while he is that much still on its cause outside. If one looks carefully, it could be seen that the guy does not even pretend to change his behaviour to deal with something he did. No, he is higher than having his will restricted. He just deal with the effect of a bad thing he does and change the world to make it fit his behaviour. For example, to deal with spreading degrading things about a person he may make others degrade themselves without even bothering himself to stop.    

+9

Continuing from post +7
Couple of days ago it occurred me the view of how much of this guy's trials where he already had more than sufficient signs to the contrary is just like a direct psychotic fighting of reality through denial except that it is done in a more artistic way that may even gets praised for an apparent conforming to reality instead.