Wednesday, September 27, 2017

+24

Continuing from the preceding post:
In trying to take account for a passive side of "respecting" I missed that by default there is no such side here unless proven otherwise. That is because I probably mistakenly compared the situation here with other situations where the word used, because of targeting the action from the receiving  side, is, unlike here, wide enough in its meaning to include a passive effect. The way the Amendment was written helped or directed me to notice that. 
By the way, I probably needed to do more thinking before putting the example of giving Christmas as holiday just because people like that, without intermediate reasons, in post +22, in the same basket with those in the lower half of the post preceding it.       

No comments:

Post a Comment