They may think they can out smart the world and its intelligence agencies playing this strategy of multiple identities and dividing the good and bad roles accordingly. But they actually only out smarted themselves and it is better for the killing and cruelty to stop because these atrocities are being added to the tab of the whole group and not only the part showing these bad actions. The idiots don't know that those on the other side invented the good-bad combination strategy in here.  

But, if true, is this the first time they used such strategy with a short sighted view to the future consequences it can bring? Or is this a repetition to how they also thought that the consequences of things they caused in Iraq wont affect them but then paid a long term heavy price for it when the United States found it hard to bring itself to help them against the dictator when they needed that help? 

There are things that seem to suggest with significant probability that some in Syria has been playing the dual identity game using the group currently in the news to carry their savage criminality without it being counted on them. If true, then they would be very stupid to expect such a game to pass on the CIA and its equivalent agencies in other countries. While innocent people shouldn't be held responsible for such games played by these groups, it would still be more helpful to the later to let the dictator's regime be on the lesser scale of morality. Or could it be that they played a show of the abduction and saving of the NBC reporter claiming it on the dictator and think it really passed on the intelligence agencies of the world?

You want to know how the religious standing of a group like the one currently in the news these days may feel to a Muslim not sick or savage like those in a group like that? What if that same group was claiming that they fight with instead of against the American forces? How directly contradictory to the facts such a claim would be? That is the level of direct contradiction and externality to the religion their religious standing claims feel. Even if we start from a level away from why they are fighting and killing, where in Islam it says that someone can be held responsible for the actions of others? Where does it say that you can take hostages let alone killing them? More than that, as it relates to their recent savagery crime, killing a messenger has always been showing the level of criminality and savagery everywhere. A news reporter is like a messenger with the additional benefit to you of being a messenger for you instead of just to you, doing you the favor of carrying your voice to the outside.     

Those who preferred the sewer- 2

If it were me in your position I would have asked what argument was intended to be supported by conveying such things. Otherwise I wouldn't allow to be dragged this low for no reason with a thing like that.

Also, if you couldn't see who is top and who is bottom and the level of inferiority feelings and desperation here then there is a serious deficiency with you. The conveying of the message itself here carries more significance than, and reverses, the intention behind the mere content of the message. 

You depended on the interpretations of a kid in a different house for what he is witnessing  through the walls for something like that on someone in my position? Did some kind of a cancer treatment depend on that? Otherwise, this is not even a question of lack of morality and rumor loving. This is the behaviour of someone who is held hostage to the shallowness he is unable to escape in the world.         

Those who preferred the sewer

And no, I am not referring to those turtles here.

I once told this hedge fund guy on a stock message board that, because of the ways he is coming from everywhere, I am afraid that one time I will open the toilet lid and see him inside. While he certainly cant physically fit there he nevertheless found a way to bring himself to be in an equivalent position. Anyway, everyone positions himself where he thinks he belongs. Unfortunately he was also able to drag so many followers with him to that same position making them in addition to sinking morally like him also sink intelligently. They sank at all the levels of what, where and how. They probably thought that since I do not spend my time complaining about the discrimination I see then it is reasonable to even judge the trivial claims on me in the environment where I live through any trivial means provided and for no worthy purpose. They assumed conclusions not necessarily implied by what is being conveyed which they also failed to see if it is equivalent to what they understand.Yet they did not recognize that sinking of them and instead thought that the other side should explain himself to them. But to my surprise that was not the whole story here. To my even bigger unexpected surprise, it appears that when the hedge fund guy felt failure despite sinking to that level he was able to turn that around by making a theory its acceptance despite its dependence on converting the positive to negative and lack of making sense showed astonishing levels of shallowness here.

[(Added 8/12/2014) Notice that I used "it appears" there not to express closeness in discovery time because I know much of what this guy does as he do them]

How I follow religion - 3

Notice that I did not concentrate on that issue to declare myself as an exception to what I came from because I witnessed or understood such thing as a common practice there. Actually, to the best of my judgment the watching and accountability on women is much bigger and/or much harder to be avoided in comparison. But I wrote that just in case I cause a positive thing which would cause that to be seen less negatively and reduce the will to stand against it and preventing it ,no matter how rarely or wherever they occur , because it is thought as a common practice where I came from. 

Sorry, that was the closest I was able to bring myself to what seems to be taken as part of normal life here watching others die without making any choice for that  because of something we empower but don't really need.   

Recognition of same sex marriage: Reasoned vs. Legal argument - 3

In other words, beside judging the issue at the root, the uniformity in applying the same rules on something as far as this from causing injury to others as was applied on its legal precedents is another question that needs to be dealt with justly.