Beside what was mentioned in the previous post there is this additional sign. This sign is interesting because it is by itself a combination of different things.
At first I did not think of the police chief complaining that the school bus driver did not check on the beaten boy other than probably a disguise but later it showed a depth potential deeper than that. I remember a soccer commentator where I came from who used to get exited when a player interrupt the passing of the ball from the opposing team while at the same time he passes the ball to a partner in his team with the that same move. It seems that there is something similar to that here. By attacking the school bus driver for not checking on the beaten boy even after the attack ,the police chief could be not only defending the plan through a disguise but also by that same attack on the school bus driver he could be providing a support for the school bus driver in that he was unable to verify whether the attack on the boy was real or fake because he did not check on the boy to see the rusting injuries.
This connect well with the driver saying that beaten boy skedaddled from the bus. That imply the supposedly beaten boy passed fast and the school bus driver did not have enough time to see the injuries of the boy.
To increase the clarity of this picture notice how the school bus driver was shouting while he stood in his place as if he was tied to his place which support a defence that he did not come close to see what was really going on. Also notice how the other boys in the bus stayed in their place and how the attackers covered most of the scene with their bodies.
Having said that, notice that I have no interest in denying such thing if real and wouldn't hesitate for one second n choosing between the aggressor side and the victim side. But I see a probability that some are playing a game and that is why I wrote about the subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment