I think that some of the energy in the demonstrations related to that case could have been employed for something that could better serve the case like the polling I mentioned in a previous post.
Again, I believe the verdict of this trial ,and I emphasize that is related to only the verdict not the events that led to the death that was the subject of that trial, was at the root the result of corruption and preparation of jury for the defendant, not racism . I think that a polling like the one I described in that post (or any equivalent one) will strengthen the proof of that much further.
The point is whatever your case is you need to present it as much as possible in an undeniable form. Even if you do not want to prosecute ,proving your case doesn't mean you necessarily want to prosecute or do not want to forgive. Prove your case then forgive as much as you want (of whatever you have the right to forgive). Proving your case could at least have the benefit of strengthening your position for similar situations in the future in demanding a much better transparency because the system can not be trusted.
No comments:
Post a Comment