Only allowed on the Shia

This invasion of another country to suppress a specific group happens only to the Shia and twice by the Saudi Government. 

We keep hearing all the complaining and see all this reaction for the like of those bigotry claims regarding Iran's connection. Imagine what could have had happened had Iran done similar invasions and singling out one specific group to suppress.

The CBS news anchor conveyed from the Saudis or those with them the claim that the rebels there are worse than ISIS and I don't know on what facts that was based? Did they invade and occupy another country with a democratic system like ISIS did in Iraq? No they did not do that to even the Saudi dictatorship neighboring them. Did they carry attacks on civilians? On the contrary, it seems, as usual, the Shia are again the victims of attacks on civilians while holding themselves from responding in the same criminal manner and generalizing on the innocent in the other side.Did they abduct people and execute them like ISIS did? The answer again seems to be no. 

But , like what happened when going into Iraq with creating the belief that the world will end if Shia take power before they do anything , again we see that this group was prejudged from this stage to be worse than ISIS and that shows the level of bigotry toward the Shia there.

And what about the Shia in Bahrain demanding a democratic representation? Were those people also worse than ISIS when the Saudi army flexed its muscles on those civilians? What other country in the region shares with the Saudi government this  entitlement to interfere in another country against a specific group despite not being attacked itself?

If the democratic countries are allowing this for the sake of justice and democracy then there should be a specific objectives and path leading to that target and not simply just allowing the Saudi government to single out the group it hates to weaken.

A statement from a White House related person stated that they are not trying to build a Jeffersonian democracy there. Why not? That sounds to me like a discrimination. Democracy is for all people. The difficulty the US faced in Iraq is the result of projections stemming from an identity complex that caused you to even lack the capacity to act with adult recognition and discerning to things there.