This is degrading to the world

I repeat again, this singling out to the Shia to be attacked despite their being within the limits of their own country, is a discrimination that is very degrading to the world to condone and should be refused now not fifty years later.

Did we see any atrocities or even hear credible claims about crimes against civilians committed by that group in Yemen that justify treating them this differently than other groups fighting internally?

But that shows the world the level of discrimination and hatred to the Shia there. They keep sounding the alarm about Iran             connection whenever things are about the Shia because they refuse to accept the existence of the Shia except if seeing as part of a foreign entity. 

I wish one news person who keep following that false alarm and participating in its bigotry, to explain, for example for our Yemen related issue here, why whatever connection Iran has there deserves to be mentioned as part of the news more than that which exists between the Saudi government and the other side there?

So if the question of how can justice and democracy come from a dictatorship like the Saudi's is not enough by itself we face in addition to it the question of their sever discrimination and singling out to one specific group. So does anyone think that interference by an entity like this is for the sake of justice and democracy or can really serve that cause better than keeping such entity away? Even as a proxy, how can anyone with intelligence and moral values trust the eyes and hands of such entity on the path and outcome there.

Despite how the suffering by the restrictions the Shia in Iraq imposed on themselves in following forms for justice made required by American projections stemming from their identity complex, instead of giving the priority to what they truly believe inside as the just thing to do, could have affected negatively their moral level in fighting, still, there is a huge difference in morality between the Badr Brigade and an entity like the Saudi's and their coalition in case the president here thinks that he discovered a proxy strategy from that situation in Iraq he wants to repeat. Anyone sees the two as equivalent despite all of the events and signs out there is either in extreme denial or extreme stupidity (although those might not be exactly separate).

Finally, don't tell me you are not seeking a Jeffersonian democracy there because that what distinguishes the objectives of a morally restricted democracy from any pile of dirt making a coalition to invade another country to suppress a specific group.