+49

Actually, that example in the preceding post was not randomly chosen but what pushed away postponing pointing out the core content of that post. A special focus, if not the main focus, was to oppose any judge especially Supreme Court judges who maintain that such claim was made because to me it is a horrifying thing. I think that such difference between existence and nonexistence should be clear especially to a judge and am very interested, if not in need, to see what argument supports what opposes my position on that claim. In fact it never occurred to me that there could be Supreme Court judges on the opposing side here until I saw what made me fear that could be the case after mentioning this as example elsewhere. Another thing that only occurred to me as a probability after I made that post. because of something I saw, was that post could be seen about my case. I would have posted the same with or without my case and it feels very frustrating to be taken that way this easily despite all what I have written. I am also very capable of seeing that I could be vehemently opposed on one issue while joined on the other by the same person, regardless of which of those two reactions put at the front. 

By the way, despite how intensely I wrote about not removing Saddam from power in the earlier war and the massacre that happened to the people after the uprising as a consequence to him being in power, I do not maintain that any promise for removing him from power was made from the government here and would oppose anyone from there claiming otherwise.