One could also say that because of its position as the final judiciary point the Supreme Court has a duty not only to rule on individual cases but also to rule on the effectiveness of the judicial system in applying justice as a whole through the individual cases reaching it. A significant step in that direction could be made if simply when looking at cases for selection each of the judges of the court at least based on first impression indicates whether a non selected case deserves to be reviewed had there been sufficient time. I don't see how the justices were not formulating these first impression opinions on the fly while selecting cases but they simply don't reveal that which would cost them very little additional effort if they do. That is very much needed in order to enable all legislators to have a wider view about how effective in applying justice their judicial systems work.
Since the Supreme Court is the final judiciary point each case reaching it has two types of defendants.One type of defendants are those mentioned in the complaint while the other is the judicial system itself. In other words stating the deficiency of the judicial system on the basis of individual cases would not push the court away from its judicial rule.
No comments:
Post a Comment